Xeon D-1622 vs Gold 6138T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6138T
2017
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
13.05
+233%
Xeon D-1622
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 40 Watt
3.92

Xeon Gold 6138T outperforms Xeon D-1622 by a whopping 233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon D-1622 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5741437
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.2721.96
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Xeon D
Power efficiency9.849.24
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,742$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon D-1622 has 572% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6138T.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon D-1622 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads408
Base clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Multiplier2026
L1 cache1.25 MB256 KB
L2 cache20 MB1 MB
L3 cache27.5 MB6 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperature94 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon D-1622 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt40 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon D-1622. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data-
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
AMTno dataSPS 3.0
Quiet Systemno data-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon D-1622 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon D-1622 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon D-1622. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GB128 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s34.124 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon D-1622.

PCIe version3.02.0/3.0
PCI Express lanes4832
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data6
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data6
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6138T 13.05
+233%
Xeon D-1622 3.92

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6138T 20649
+233%
Xeon D-1622 6205

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.05 3.92
Recency 25 April 2017 2 April 2019
Physical cores 20 4
Threads 40 8
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 40 Watt

Xeon Gold 6138T has a 232.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

Xeon D-1622, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6138T is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1622 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon D-1622, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
Xeon Gold 6138T
Intel Xeon D-1622
Xeon D-1622

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6138T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1622 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6138T or Xeon D-1622, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.