Xeon E5-2640 vs Gold 6137

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6137
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 205 Watt
12.42
+207%
Xeon E5-2640
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.04

Xeon Gold 6137 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 by a whopping 207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6137 and Xeon E5-2640 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6291425
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.71
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency5.633.95
Architecture codenameno dataSandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date1 July 2017 (7 years ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$162

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6137 and Xeon E5-2640 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3 GHz
Bus rateno data7.2 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB15360 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data435 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data73 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,270 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6137 and Xeon E5-2640 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6137 and Xeon E5-2640. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6137 and Xeon E5-2640 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6137 and Xeon E5-2640 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6137 and Xeon E5-2640. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GB384 GB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6137 and Xeon E5-2640.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4840

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6137 12.42
+207%
Xeon E5-2640 4.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6137 19365
+208%
Xeon E5-2640 6294

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.42 4.04
Recency 1 July 2017 6 March 2012
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon Gold 6137 has a 207.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2640, on the other hand, has 115.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6137 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2640 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6137 and Xeon E5-2640, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6137
Xeon Gold 6137
Intel Xeon E5-2640
Xeon E5-2640

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6137 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1094 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6137 or Xeon E5-2640, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.