EPYC 7272 vs Xeon Gold 6134

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6134
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
10.66
EPYC 7272
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
16.14
+51.4%

EPYC 7272 outperforms Xeon Gold 6134 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 7272 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking739423
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.7711.65
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.6212.49
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,214$625

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7272 has 321% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6134.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 7272 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3229
L1 cache512 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 7272 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 7272. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 7272 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 7272 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 7272. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 7272.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6134 10.66
EPYC 7272 16.14
+51.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6134 16614
EPYC 7272 25161
+51.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.66 16.14
Recency 25 April 2017 7 August 2019
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 120 Watt

EPYC 7272 has a 51.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 8.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7272 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6134 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 7272, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6134
Xeon Gold 6134
AMD EPYC 7272
EPYC 7272

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6134 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7272 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6134 or EPYC 7272, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.