Xeon Gold 5515+ vs Gold 6132

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6132
2017
14 cores / 28 threads, 140 Watt
14.23
Xeon Gold 5515+
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 165 Watt
16.41
+15.3%

Xeon Gold 5515+ outperforms Xeon Gold 6132 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6132 and Xeon Gold 5515+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking523412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.9034.88
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency9.449.24
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,111$1,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5515+ has 612% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6132.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6132 and Xeon Gold 5515+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2816
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache896 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache14 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB22.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6132 and Xeon Gold 5515+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA36474677
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6132 and Xeon Gold 5515+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6132 and Xeon Gold 5515+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6132 and Xeon Gold 5515+ are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6132 and Xeon Gold 5515+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6132 and Xeon Gold 5515+.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6132 14.23
Xeon Gold 5515+ 16.41
+15.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6132 22180
Xeon Gold 5515+ 25587
+15.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.23 16.41
Recency 25 April 2017 14 December 2023
Physical cores 14 8
Threads 28 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon Gold 6132 has 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads, and 17.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5515+, on the other hand, has a 15.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 5515+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6132 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6132 and Xeon Gold 5515+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6132
Xeon Gold 6132
Intel Xeon Gold 5515+
Xeon Gold 5515+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6132 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 5515 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6132 or Xeon Gold 5515+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.