Apple M1 Pro vs Xeon Gold 6130

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6130
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
13.00
+20.1%
Apple M1 Pro
2021
10 cores / 10 threads, 2064 Watt
10.82

Xeon Gold 6130 outperforms Apple M1 Pro by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6130 and Apple M1 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking575712
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.69no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldApple M-Series
Power efficiency9.84no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)no data
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,894no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6130 and Apple M1 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3210
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.22 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1 MB2.9 MB
L2 cache16 MB28 MB
L3 cache22 MB24 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature87 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6130 and Apple M1 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt2064 ‑ 3220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6130 and Apple M1 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6130 and Apple M1 Pro technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6130 and Apple M1 Pro are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6130 and Apple M1 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6130 and Apple M1 Pro.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6130 13.00
+20.1%
Apple M1 Pro 10.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6130 20647
+20.1%
Apple M1 Pro 17191

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.00 10.82
Recency 25 April 2017 18 October 2021
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 32 10
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 2064 Watt

Xeon Gold 6130 has a 20.1% higher aggregate performance score, 60% more physical cores and 220% more threads, and 1551.2% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Pro, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6130 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 Pro in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6130 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 Pro is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6130 and Apple M1 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6130
Xeon Gold 6130
Apple M1 Pro
M1 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 10 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 406 votes

Rate Apple M1 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6130 or Apple M1 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.