i7-1255U vs Xeon Gold 6126

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6126
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
12.08
+41.6%
Core i7-1255U
2022
10 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
8.53

Xeon Gold 6126 outperforms Core i7-1255U by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6126 and Core i7-1255U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking643895
Place by popularitynot in top-10074
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.24no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Alder Lake-M
Power efficiency9.1553.82
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Alder Lake-U (2022)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)23 February 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,776no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6126 and Core i7-1255U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads2412
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache768 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature86 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6126 and Core i7-1255U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6126 and Core i7-1255U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6126 and Core i7-1255U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6126 and Core i7-1255U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6126 and Core i7-1255U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1250 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6126 and Core i7-1255U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6126 12.08
+41.6%
i7-1255U 8.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6126 19189
+41.7%
i7-1255U 13545

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.08 8.53
Recency 25 April 2017 23 February 2022
Physical cores 12 10
Threads 24 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon Gold 6126 has a 41.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 20% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i7-1255U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6126 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-1255U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6126 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-1255U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6126 and Core i7-1255U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6126
Xeon Gold 6126
Intel Core i7-1255U
Core i7-1255U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6126 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 823 votes

Rate Core i7-1255U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6126 or Core i7-1255U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.