Celeron 220 vs Xeon Gold 6126

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6126 and Celeron 220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking633not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.42no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency9.14no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Conroe (2006−2007)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,776no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6126 and Celeron 220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads241
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s533 MHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache768 KB64 KB
L2 cache12 MB512 KB
L3 cache19.25 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data77 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6126 and Celeron 220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt19 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6126 and Celeron 220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6126 and Celeron 220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6126 and Celeron 220 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6126 and Celeron 220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6126 and Celeron 220.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6126 19189
+9081%
Celeron 220 209

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 12 1
Threads 24 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 19 Watt

Xeon Gold 6126 has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 220, on the other hand, has 557.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 6126 and Celeron 220. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6126 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 220 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6126 and Celeron 220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6126
Xeon Gold 6126
Intel Celeron 220
Celeron 220

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6126 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 59 votes

Rate Celeron 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6126 or Celeron 220, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.