Atom C3958 vs Xeon Gold 6126

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6126
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
11.92
+330%

Xeon Gold 6126 outperforms Atom C3958 by a whopping 330% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6126 and Atom C3958 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6191633
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.670.54
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Atom
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)15 August 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,776$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6126 has 3543% better value for money than Atom C3958.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6126 and Atom C3958 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2416
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache768 KB896 KB
L2 cache12 MB16 MB
L3 cache19.25 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature86 °C83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6126 and Atom C3958 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket Pno data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6126 and Atom C3958. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6126 and Atom C3958 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6126 and Atom C3958 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6126 and Atom C3958. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size768 GB256 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6126 and Atom C3958.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6126 11.92
+330%
Atom C3958 2.77

Xeon Gold 6126 outperforms Atom C3958 by 330% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6126 18441
+331%
Atom C3958 4281

Xeon Gold 6126 outperforms Atom C3958 by 331% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.92 2.77
Recency 25 April 2017 15 August 2017
Physical cores 12 16
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 31 Watt

Xeon Gold 6126 has a 330.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more threads.

Atom C3958, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, 33.3% more physical cores, and 303.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6126 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3958 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6126 and Atom C3958, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6126
Xeon Gold 6126
Intel Atom C3958
Atom C3958

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6126 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Atom C3958 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6126 or Atom C3958, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.