Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs Xeon Gold 5520+
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 5520+ and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Architecture codename | Emerald Rapids (2023) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) | 4 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,640 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 5520+ and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 28 (Octacosa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 56 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 52.5 MB (shared) | 36 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 2x 763 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 85 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 5520+ and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 4677 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5520+ and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XDNA 2 NPU |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 5520+ and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5520+ and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5520+ and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5520+ and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 80 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 4 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 28 | 12 |
| Threads | 56 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 55 Watt |
Xeon Gold 5520+ has 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 272.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 5520+ and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Gold 5520+ is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5520+ and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
