Xeon Gold 5412U vs Gold 5416S

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5416S
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
23.51
Xeon Gold 5412U
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
34.34
+46.1%

Xeon Gold 5412U outperforms Xeon Gold 5416S by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon Gold 5412U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking227118
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation64.0093.03
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency14.2916.93
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date10 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$944$1,113

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5412U has 45% better value for money than Xeon Gold 5416S.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon Gold 5412U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3248
Base clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB45 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)79 °C81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon Gold 5412U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4677FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon Gold 5412U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon Gold 5412U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXYes with Intel® SPSYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon Gold 5412U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon Gold 5412U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4400DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size4 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon Gold 5412U.

PCIe version55
PCI Express lanes8080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5416S 23.51
Xeon Gold 5412U 34.34
+46.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5416S 35976
Xeon Gold 5412U 52557
+46.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.51 34.34
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 32 48
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 185 Watt

Xeon Gold 5416S has 23.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5412U, on the other hand, has a 46.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 5412U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5416S in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon Gold 5412U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
Xeon Gold 5416S
Intel Xeon Gold 5412U
Xeon Gold 5412U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 5416S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5412U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5416S or Xeon Gold 5412U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.