Apple M3 Max 16-Core vs Xeon Gold 5416S

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5416S
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
23.08
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
26.30
+14%

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Xeon Gold 5416S by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5416S and Apple M3 Max 16-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking231188
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation63.99no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M3
Power efficiency14.2931.32
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)no data
Release date10 January 2023 (1 year ago)30 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$944no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5416S and Apple M3 Max 16-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.06 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache30 MBno data
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm3 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)79 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data92000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5416S and Apple M3 Max 16-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA4677no data
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt78 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5416S and Apple M3 Max 16-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5416S and Apple M3 Max 16-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5416S and Apple M3 Max 16-Core are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5416S and Apple M3 Max 16-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4400no data
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5416S and Apple M3 Max 16-Core.

PCIe version5no data
PCI Express lanes80no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5416S 23.08
Apple M3 Max 16-Core 26.30
+14%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5416S 35976
Apple M3 Max 16-Core 40993
+13.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.08 26.30
Recency 10 January 2023 30 October 2023
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 78 Watt

Xeon Gold 5416S has 100% more threads.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core, on the other hand, has a 14% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Apple M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5416S in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5416S is a server/workstation processor while Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5416S and Apple M3 Max 16-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
Xeon Gold 5416S
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 5416S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 265 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5416S or Apple M3 Max 16-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.