EPYC 9135 vs Xeon Gold 5415+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5415+
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 150 Watt
15.71
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+133%

EPYC 9135 outperforms Xeon Gold 5415+ by a whopping 133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5415+ and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking43696
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation34.5929.26
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency9.9117.30
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Turin (2024)
Release date10 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,076$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5415+ has 18% better value for money than EPYC 9135.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5415+ and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache22.5 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data2x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5415+ and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
Socket4677SP5
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5415+ and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5415+ and EPYC 9135 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5415+ and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5415+ and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4400DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5415+ and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes80128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5415+ 15.71
EPYC 9135 36.56
+133%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5415+ 24951
EPYC 9135 58070
+133%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.71 36.56
Recency 10 January 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 200 Watt

Xeon Gold 5415+ has 33.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 132.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5415+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5415+ and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5415+
Xeon Gold 5415+
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5415 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5415+ or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.