Xeon Max 9480 vs Gold 5411N
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 5411N and Xeon Max 9480 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 24 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.03 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Power efficiency | no data | 14.40 |
Architecture codename | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) |
Release date | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,388 | $12,980 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 5411N and Xeon Max 9480 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 56 (Hexapentaconta-Core) |
Threads | 48 | 112 |
Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 45 MB | 112.5 MB |
Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | no data | 4x 477 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 84 °C | 64 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 5411N and Xeon Max 9480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Socket | FCLGA4677 | 4677 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5411N and Xeon Max 9480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | + |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 5411N and Xeon Max 9480 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | no data |
SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5411N and Xeon Max 9480 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5411N and Xeon Max 9480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5-4400 | DDR5-4800 |
Maximum memory size | 4 TB | no data |
Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5411N and Xeon Max 9480.
PCIe version | 5 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 80 | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 24 | 56 |
Threads | 48 | 112 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 350 Watt |
Xeon Gold 5411N has 112.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon Max 9480, on the other hand, has 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 5411N and Xeon Max 9480. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5411N and Xeon Max 9480, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.