Core i7-13700H vs Xeon Gold 5320H
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i7-13700H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 341 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Raptor Lake-H |
| Architecture codename | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) | Raptor Lake-H |
| Release date | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i7-13700H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 20 (Icosa-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 40 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 1.2 MB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 11.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 27.5 MB (shared) | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i7-13700H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
| Socket | 4189 | BGA1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i7-13700H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i7-13700H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i7-13700H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i7-13700H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2667 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i7-13700H.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 April 2021 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 20 | 14 |
| Threads | 40 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
Xeon Gold 5320H has 42.9% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
i7-13700H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i7-13700H. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Gold 5320H is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-13700H is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i7-13700H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
