i5-14401E vs Xeon Gold 5320H
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i5-14401E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 279 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 12.60 | no data |
Architecture codename | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024) |
Release date | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) | July 2024 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i5-14401E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 20 (Icosa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 40 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 27.5 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | no data | 215 mm2 |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i5-14401E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA4189 | 1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i5-14401E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | + |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i5-14401E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i5-14401E are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i5-14401E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 RDIMM | DDR4, DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 1.12 TB | no data |
Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 730 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i5-14401E.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 48 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 20 | 6 |
Threads | 40 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon Gold 5320H has 233.3% more physical cores and 233.3% more threads.
i5-14401E, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 130.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i5-14401E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Gold 5320H is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-14401E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5320H and Core i5-14401E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.