Ultra 5 245KF vs Xeon Gold 5318Y

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5318Y
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
21.35
Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
28.48
+33.4%

Core Ultra 5 245KF outperforms Xeon Gold 5318Y by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5318Y and Core Ultra 5 245KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking260168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data79.32
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency12.0221.16
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)24 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5318Y and Core Ultra 5 245KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads4814
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)87 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5318Y and Core Ultra 5 245KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA41891851
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5318Y and Core Ultra 5 245KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5318Y and Core Ultra 5 245KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5318Y and Core Ultra 5 245KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5318Y and Core Ultra 5 245KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5318Y and Core Ultra 5 245KF.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5318Y 21.35
Ultra 5 245KF 28.48
+33.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5318Y 33283
Ultra 5 245KF 44396
+33.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.35 28.48
Recency 6 April 2021 24 October 2024
Physical cores 24 14
Threads 48 14
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Gold 5318Y has 71.4% more physical cores and 242.9% more threads.

Ultra 5 245KF, on the other hand, has a 33.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 32% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 5 245KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5318Y in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5318Y is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 245KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5318Y and Core Ultra 5 245KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Xeon Gold 5318Y
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Core Ultra 5 245KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 13 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5318Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5318Y or Core Ultra 5 245KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.