Celeron G6900T vs Xeon Gold 5317

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5317
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 150 Watt
17.24
+584%
Celeron G6900T
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
2.52

Xeon Gold 5317 outperforms Celeron G6900T by a whopping 584% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5317 and Celeron G6900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3651740
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency10.886.81
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5317 and Celeron G6900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache18 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5317 and Celeron G6900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5317 and Celeron G6900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5317 and Celeron G6900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5317 and Celeron G6900T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5317 and Celeron G6900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size6 TB128 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon Gold 5317 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon Gold 5317 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon Gold 5317 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5317 and Celeron G6900T.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5317 17.24
+584%
Celeron G6900T 2.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5317 27387
+584%
Celeron G6900T 4003

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Gold 5317 1260
Celeron G6900T 1401
+11.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Gold 5317 9808
+298%
Celeron G6900T 2463

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.24 2.52
Recency 6 April 2021 4 January 2022
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon Gold 5317 has a 584.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

Celeron G6900T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 5317 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900T in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5317 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G6900T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5317 and Celeron G6900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5317
Xeon Gold 5317
Intel Celeron G6900T
Celeron G6900T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5317 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 676 votes

Rate Celeron G6900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5317 or Celeron G6900T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.