Processor 300 vs Xeon Gold 5220R

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5220R
2020
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
20.67
+358%
Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51

Xeon Gold 5220R outperforms Processor 300 by a whopping 358% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5220R and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2691319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.01no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency13.049.28
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,555$82

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5220R and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads484
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache1.5 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5220R and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA36471700
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5220R and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5220R and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5220R and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5220R and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5220R and Processor 300.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5220R 20.67
+358%
Processor 300 4.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5220R 32837
+359%
Processor 300 7160

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.67 4.51
Recency 24 February 2020 8 January 2024
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 46 Watt

Xeon Gold 5220R has a 358.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 226.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 5220R is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor 300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5220R is a server/workstation processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5220R and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5220R
Xeon Gold 5220R
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5220R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5220R or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.