Xeon Gold 6137 vs Gold 5218

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5218
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
13.89
+11.8%
Xeon Gold 6137
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 205 Watt
12.42

Xeon Gold 5218 outperforms Xeon Gold 6137 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5218 and Xeon Gold 6137 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking541629
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.79no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency10.325.63
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)1 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,273no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5218 and Xeon Gold 6137 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache1 MBno data
L2 cache16 MBno data
L3 cache22 MB25 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature87 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5218 and Xeon Gold 6137 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5218 and Xeon Gold 6137. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5218 and Xeon Gold 6137 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5218 and Xeon Gold 6137 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5218 and Xeon Gold 6137. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size1 TB768 GB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5218 and Xeon Gold 6137.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5218 13.89
+11.8%
Xeon Gold 6137 12.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5218 21651
+11.8%
Xeon Gold 6137 19365

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.89 12.42
Recency 2 April 2019 1 July 2017
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 205 Watt

Xeon Gold 5218 has a 11.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 64% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 5218 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6137 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5218 and Xeon Gold 6137, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5218
Xeon Gold 5218
Intel Xeon Gold 6137
Xeon Gold 6137

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 22 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5218 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6137 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5218 or Xeon Gold 6137, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.