Xeon E7540 vs Gold 5215

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5215
2019
10 cores / 20 threads, 85 Watt
9.90
+51.6%
Xeon E7540
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 105 Watt
6.53

Xeon Gold 5215 outperforms Xeon E7540 by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5215 and Xeon E7540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7771041
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.85no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency11.025.89
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,221no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5215 and Xeon E7540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2012
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.27 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache640 KBno data
L2 cache10 MBno data
L3 cache13.75 MB18 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature77 °C64 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5215 and Xeon E7540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1567
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5215 and Xeon E7540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5215 and Xeon E7540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5215 and Xeon E7540 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5215 and Xeon E7540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667no data
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5215 and Xeon E7540.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5215 9.90
+51.6%
Xeon E7540 6.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5215 15719
+51.5%
Xeon E7540 10376

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.90 6.53
Recency 2 April 2019 1 January 2010
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 20 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon Gold 5215 has a 51.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 23.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 5215 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7540 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5215 and Xeon E7540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5215
Xeon Gold 5215
Intel Xeon E7540
Xeon E7540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5215 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E7540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5215 or Xeon E7540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.