Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Xeon Gold 5120

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5120
2017
14 cores / 28 threads, 105 Watt
11.83
Ryzen 9 6900HS
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.41
+30.3%

Ryzen 9 6900HS outperforms Xeon Gold 5120 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5120 and Ryzen 9 6900HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking679471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.23no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency10.2740.15
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,555no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5120 and Ryzen 9 6900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2816
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.9 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache896 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache14 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5120 and Ryzen 9 6900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FP7
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Ryzen 9 6900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5120 and Ryzen 9 6900HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Ryzen 9 6900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Ryzen 9 6900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Ryzen 9 6900HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5120 11.83
Ryzen 9 6900HS 15.41
+30.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5120 18111
Ryzen 9 6900HS 23581
+30.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.83 15.41
Physical cores 14 8
Threads 28 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon Gold 5120 has 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads.

Ryzen 9 6900HS, on the other hand, has a 30.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 6900HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5120 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5120 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 6900HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5120 and Ryzen 9 6900HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5120
Xeon Gold 5120
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
Ryzen 9 6900HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 137 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 6900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5120 or Ryzen 9 6900HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.