i3-10105F vs Xeon Gold 5120

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5120
2017
14 cores / 28 threads, 105 Watt
11.62
+101%
Core i3-10105F
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.77

Xeon Gold 5120 outperforms Core i3-10105F by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5120 and Core i3-10105F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6831132
Place by popularitynot in top-10056
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.13no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency10.288.24
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Comet Lake-R (2021)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,555$97

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5120 and Core i3-10105F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads288
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache896 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache14 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature81 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5120 and Core i3-10105F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Core i3-10105F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5120 and Core i3-10105F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Core i3-10105F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Core i3-10105F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size768 GB128 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s41.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Core i3-10105F.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5120 11.62
+101%
i3-10105F 5.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5120 18111
+101%
i3-10105F 8992

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.62 5.77
Recency 11 July 2017 16 March 2021
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 28 8
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Gold 5120 has a 101.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

i3-10105F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 61.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 5120 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-10105F in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5120 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-10105F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5120 and Core i3-10105F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5120
Xeon Gold 5120
Intel Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3577 votes

Rate Core i3-10105F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5120 or Core i3-10105F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.