Xeon X3480 vs Gold 5118

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5118
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
10.71
+410%
Xeon X3480
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.10

Xeon Gold 5118 outperforms Xeon X3480 by a whopping 410% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5118 and Xeon X3480 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7361890
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.45no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency9.472.05
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)no data
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)1 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,273no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5118 and Xeon X3480 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.06 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.73 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache12 MBno data
L3 cache16.5 MB8 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature81 °C73 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5118 and Xeon X3480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5118 and Xeon X3480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5118 and Xeon X3480 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5118 and Xeon X3480 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5118 and Xeon X3480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size768 GB32 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5118 and Xeon X3480.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5118 10.71
+410%
Xeon X3480 2.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5118 16691
+410%
Xeon X3480 3273

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.71 2.10
Recency 11 July 2017 1 April 2010
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon Gold 5118 has a 410% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon X3480, on the other hand, has 10.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 5118 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3480 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5118 and Xeon X3480, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5118
Xeon Gold 5118
Intel Xeon X3480
Xeon X3480

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5118 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 142 votes

Rate Xeon X3480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5118 or Xeon X3480, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.