Celeron G5925 vs Xeon Gold 5117F
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 5117F and Celeron G5925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1933 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 20.58 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon Gold | no data |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) | no data |
| Release date | 11 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 1 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 5117F and Celeron G5925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 28 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 896 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 14 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 19.25 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 81 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 5117F and Celeron G5925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Socket P | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 113 Watt | 58 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5117F and Celeron G5925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 5117F and Celeron G5925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5117F and Celeron G5925 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5117F and Celeron G5925. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 115.212 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5117F and Celeron G5925.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 July 2017 | 1 July 2020 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 113 Watt | 58 Watt |
Celeron G5925 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 94.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 5117F and Celeron G5925. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Gold 5117F is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G5925 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5117F and Celeron G5925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
