i7-2700K vs Xeon Gold 5117
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 5117 outperforms Core i7-2700K by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 5117 and Core i7-2700K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 773 | 1494 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.28 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon Gold | Core i7 (Desktop) |
| Power efficiency | 8.98 | 3.60 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 11 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 24 October 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $514 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 5117 and Core i7-2700K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 28 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 896 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 14 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 19.25 MB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 216 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 73 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,160 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 5117 and Core i7-2700K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | LGA1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5117 and Core i7-2700K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| FDI | no data | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 5117 and Core i7-2700K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5117 and Core i7-2700K are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5117 and Core i7-2700K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | 6 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 115.212 GB/s | 21 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.35 GHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon Gold 5117 and Core i7-2700K integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5117 and Core i7-2700K.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.15 | 3.68 |
| Recency | 11 July 2017 | 24 October 2011 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 4 |
| Threads | 28 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 95 Watt |
Xeon Gold 5117 has a 175.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
i7-2700K, on the other hand, has 10.5% lower power consumption.
The Xeon Gold 5117 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2700K in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Gold 5117 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-2700K is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5117 and Core i7-2700K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
