Steam Deck OLED APU vs Xeon E7530
Aggregate performance score
Steam Deck OLED APU outperforms Xeon E7530 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E7530 and Steam Deck OLED APU processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1296 | 1284 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | no data | Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) |
Power efficiency | 4.10 | 29.06 |
Architecture codename | no data | Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) |
Release date | 1 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 9 November 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E7530 and Steam Deck OLED APU basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 12 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 12 MB L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 6 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 64 °C | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E7530 and Steam Deck OLED APU compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | FCLGA1567 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7530 and Steam Deck OLED APU. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E7530 and Steam Deck OLED APU technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7530 and Steam Deck OLED APU are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7530 and Steam Deck OLED APU. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 4.72 | 4.78 |
Recency | 1 January 2010 | 9 November 2023 |
Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
Threads | 12 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 15 Watt |
Xeon E7530 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
Steam Deck OLED APU, on the other hand, has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 600% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E7530 and Steam Deck OLED APU.
Be aware that Xeon E7530 is a server/workstation processor while Steam Deck OLED APU is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7530 and Steam Deck OLED APU, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.