i3-10100Y vs Xeon E7450
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E7450 outperforms Core i3-10100Y by a whopping 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E7450 and Core i3-10100Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1063 | 1997 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 6.58 | 34.29 |
Architecture codename | no data | Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) |
Release date | 1 July 2008 (16 years ago) | 30 August 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E7450 and Core i3-10100Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | no data | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 3.9 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 4 GT/s |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 12 MB L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
VID voltage range | 0.9V-1.45V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E7450 and Core i3-10100Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | PGA604 | BGA1377 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7450 and Core i3-10100Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
Idle States | - | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E7450 and Core i3-10100Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | - |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
MPX | - | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7450 and Core i3-10100Y are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7450 and Core i3-10100Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 33.3 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
Max video memory | no data | 16 GB |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video | no data | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1 GHz |
Execution Units | no data | 24 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E7450 and Core i3-10100Y integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
DVI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E7450 and Core i3-10100Y integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | no data | + |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 3840x2160@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 3840x2160@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon E7450 and Core i3-10100Y integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7450 and Core i3-10100Y.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 10 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 6.49 | 1.88 |
Recency | 1 July 2008 | 30 August 2018 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 5 Watt |
Xeon E7450 has a 245.2% higher aggregate performance score.
i3-10100Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1700% lower power consumption.
The Xeon E7450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-10100Y in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E7450 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-10100Y is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7450 and Core i3-10100Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.