EPYC 7473X vs Xeon E7420
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E7420 and EPYC 7473X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 85 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 14.72 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Milan-X (2022) |
| Release date | 1 July 2008 (16 years ago) | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E7420 and EPYC 7473X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 768 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 0.9V-1.45V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E7420 and EPYC 7473X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | PGA604 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 240 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7420 and EPYC 7473X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E7420 and EPYC 7473X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7420 and EPYC 7473X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7420 and EPYC 7473X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7420 and EPYC 7473X.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2008 | 22 March 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 240 Watt |
Xeon E7420 has 166.7% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7473X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E7420 and EPYC 7473X. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7420 and EPYC 7473X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
