Ryzen 9 5980HS vs Xeon E7330
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 5980HS outperforms Xeon E7330 by a whopping 229% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E7330 and Ryzen 9 5980HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1394 | 552 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Power efficiency | 4.83 | 36.30 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) |
| Release date | 1 July 2007 (17 years ago) | 12 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E7330 and Ryzen 9 5980HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 30 |
| L1 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 66 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.0V-1.5V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E7330 and Ryzen 9 5980HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PGA604,PPGA604 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7330 and Ryzen 9 5980HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E7330 and Ryzen 9 5980HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7330 and Ryzen 9 5980HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7330 and Ryzen 9 5980HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7330 and Ryzen 9 5980HS.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.16 | 13.68 |
| Recency | 1 July 2007 | 12 January 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 9 5980HS has a 228.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 128.6% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 9 5980HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7330 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E7330 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 5980HS is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7330 and Ryzen 9 5980HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
