Apple M2 Pro vs Xeon E7210
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E7210 and Apple M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 537 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple Apple M-Series |
| Release date | 1 July 2007 (17 years ago) | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E7210 and Apple M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.424 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 3.3 MB |
| L2 cache | no data | 36 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 64 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 40000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 1.0V-1.5V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E7210 and Apple M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA604 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 2424 ‑ 3504 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7210 and Apple M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E7210 and Apple M2 Pro technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7210 and Apple M2 Pro are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2007 | 17 January 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 2424 Watt |
Xeon E7210 has 2930% lower power consumption.
Apple M2 Pro, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E7210 and Apple M2 Pro. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E7210 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7210 and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
