Ryzen 7 8700G vs Xeon E7-8895 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E7-8895 v2
2014
15 cores / 30 threads, 155 Watt
35.99
+79.5%
Ryzen 7 8700G
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
20.05

Xeon E7-8895 v2 outperforms Ryzen 7 8700G by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 8700G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking100277
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.36
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency21.9729.19
Architecture codenameno dataPhoenix (2023−2024)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 8700G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores15 (Pentadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3016
Base clock speed2.8 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache37.5 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 8700G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration81
Socketno dataAM5
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 8700G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 8700G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 8700G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 8700G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 8700G.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes3220

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E7-8895 v2 35.99
+79.5%
Ryzen 7 8700G 20.05

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E7-8895 v2 57165
+79.5%
Ryzen 7 8700G 31851

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.99 20.05
Recency 1 January 2014 8 January 2024
Physical cores 15 8
Threads 30 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E7-8895 v2 has a 79.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 87.5% more physical cores and 87.5% more threads.

Ryzen 7 8700G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 138.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 8700G in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E7-8895 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 8700G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 8700G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7-8895 v2
Xeon E7-8895 v2
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Ryzen 7 8700G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 116 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8895 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 240 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7-8895 v2 or Ryzen 7 8700G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.