Apple M1 Max vs Xeon E7-8860
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E7-8860 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 523 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | Intel Xeon E7 | Apple M-Series |
Architecture codename | Westmere-EX (2011) | no data |
Release date | 5 April 2011 (13 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,061 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E7-8860 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
Threads | 20 | 10 |
Base clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 2.06 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.67 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
Bus type | QPI | no data |
Bus rate | 6.4 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 17 | no data |
L1 cache | 640 KB | 2.9 MB |
L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 28 MB |
L3 cache | 24 MB | 48 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
Die size | 513 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 69 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 2600 Million | 57000 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E7-8860 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 (Multiprocessor) | no data |
Socket | FCLGA1567,LGA1567 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 2060 ‑ 3220 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-8860 and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E7-8860 and Apple M1 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-8860 and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-8860 and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 4 TB | no data |
Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.113 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 5 April 2011 | 18 October 2021 |
Threads | 20 | 10 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 2060 Watt |
Xeon E7-8860 has 100% more threads, and 1484.6% lower power consumption.
Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E7-8860 and Apple M1 Max. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E7-8860 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7-8860 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.