Xeon E7-8837 vs E5620
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5620 and Xeon E7-8837 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1813 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.08 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | no data | Intel Xeon E7 |
Power efficiency | 2.67 | no data |
Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Westmere (2010−2011) |
Release date | 16 March 2010 (14 years ago) | 5 April 2011 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $35 | $2,280 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5620 and Xeon E7-8837 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Bus type | no data | QPI |
Bus rate | no data | 6.4 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 20 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 24 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 239 mm2 | 513 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 78 °C | 69 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 2600 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5620 and Xeon E7-8837 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 | LGA1567 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon E7-8837. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5620 and Xeon E7-8837 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon E7-8837 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon E7-8837. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066 |
Maximum memory size | 288 GB | 4 TB |
Max memory channels | 3 | 4 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 34.113 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5620 and Xeon E7-8837.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 16 March 2010 | 5 April 2011 |
Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 130 Watt |
Xeon E5620 has 62.5% lower power consumption.
Xeon E7-8837, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5620 and Xeon E7-8837. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5620 and Xeon E7-8837, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.