Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon E5620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5620
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
2.27
+48.4%

Xeon E5620 outperforms Celeron G6900TE by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5620 and Celeron G6900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17562061
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.08no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$35no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5620 and Celeron G6900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5620 and Celeron G6900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket13661700
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5620 and Celeron G6900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSXno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5620 and Celeron G6900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5620 and Celeron G6900TE are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5620 and Celeron G6900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5620 and Celeron G6900TE.

PCIe version2.05.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5620 2.27
+48.4%
Celeron G6900TE 1.53

Xeon E5620 outperforms Celeron G6900TE by 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5620 3518
+48.3%
Celeron G6900TE 2373

Xeon E5620 outperforms Celeron G6900TE by 48% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.27 1.53
Recency 16 March 2010 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5620 has a 48.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron G6900TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900TE in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5620 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G6900TE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5620 and Celeron G6900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5620
Xeon E5620
Intel Celeron G6900TE
Celeron G6900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 106 votes

Rate Xeon E5620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 9 votes

Rate Celeron G6900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5620 or Celeron G6900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.