A10-5700 vs Xeon E5607

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5607
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.69
A10-5700
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.73
+2.4%

A10-5700 outperforms Xeon E5607 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5607 and A10-5700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20622044
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.80no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.002.52
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)2 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$135no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5607 and A10-5700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.26 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5607 and A10-5700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FM2
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5607 and A10-5700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5607 and A10-5700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5607 and A10-5700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5607 and A10-5700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7660D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5607 and A10-5700.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5607 1.69
A10-5700 1.73
+2.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5607 2686
A10-5700 2744
+2.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 1.73
Recency 14 February 2011 2 October 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

A10-5700 has a 2.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5607 and A10-5700.

Be aware that Xeon E5607 is a server/workstation processor while A10-5700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5607 and A10-5700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5607
Xeon E5607
AMD A10-5700
A10-5700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5 votes

Rate Xeon E5607 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 168 votes

Rate A10-5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5607 or A10-5700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.