A8-4557M vs Xeon E5606
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5606 and A8-4557M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2146 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.43 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD A-Series |
Power efficiency | 1.76 | no data |
Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
Release date | 14 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $46 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5606 and A8-4557M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 0.13 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 4 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 239 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 1303 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5606 and A8-4557M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 | BGA |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5606 and A8-4557M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5606 and A8-4557M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5606 and A8-4557M are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5606 and A8-4557M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 288 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 7640G |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5606 and A8-4557M.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 14 February 2011 | 15 May 2012 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 35 Watt |
A8-4557M has an age advantage of 1 year, and 128.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5606 and A8-4557M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5606 is a server/workstation processor while A8-4557M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5606 and A8-4557M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.