Celeron Dual-Core T1700 vs Xeon E5520

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
1.59
+137%
Celeron Dual-Core T1700
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.67

Xeon E5520 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1700 by a whopping 137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5520 and Celeron Dual-Core T1700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20962734
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.58no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency1.881.81
Architecture codenameGainestown (2009−2010)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)7 December 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$19no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5520 and Celeron Dual-Core T1700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.26 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size263 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °C100 °C
Number of transistors731 million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5520 and Celeron Dual-Core T1700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5520 and Celeron Dual-Core T1700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5520 and Celeron Dual-Core T1700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5520 and Celeron Dual-Core T1700 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5520 and Celeron Dual-Core T1700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size144 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5520 and Celeron Dual-Core T1700.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5520 1.59
+137%
Celeron Dual-Core T1700 0.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5520 2529
+139%
Celeron Dual-Core T1700 1058

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.59 0.67
Recency 30 March 2009 7 December 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5520 has a 137.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700, on the other hand, has 128.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5520 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5520 and Celeron Dual-Core T1700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5520
Xeon E5520
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700
Celeron Dual-Core T1700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate Xeon E5520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5520 or Celeron Dual-Core T1700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.