Atom E645CT vs Xeon E5450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5450 and Atom E645CT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2075not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency1.93no data
Architecture codenameno dataStellarton (2010)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)22 November 2010 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5450 and Atom E645CT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data1 (Single-Core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data26 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5450 and Atom E645CT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771Intel BGA1466
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5450 and Atom E645CT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5450 and Atom E645CT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5450 and Atom E645CT are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5450 and Atom E645CT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 600

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2007 22 November 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 4 Watt

Atom E645CT has an age advantage of 3 years, and 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5450 and Atom E645CT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5450 is a server/workstation processor while Atom E645CT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5450 and Atom E645CT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5450
Xeon E5450
Intel Atom E645CT
Atom E645CT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1275 votes

Rate Xeon E5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Atom E645CT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5450 or Atom E645CT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.