Xeon Platinum 9221 vs E5440
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5440 and Xeon Platinum 9221 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2143 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | no data | Intel Xeon Platinum |
Power efficiency | 1.77 | no data |
Architecture codename | no data | Cascade Lake-AP (2019) |
Release date | 1 January 2008 (16 years ago) | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5440 and Xeon Platinum 9221 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | no data | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
Threads | no data | 64 |
Base clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 3.7 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 21 |
L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 12 MB L2 Cache | 71.5 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 8,000 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5440 and Xeon Platinum 9221 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 8 |
Socket | LGA771 | Intel BGA5903 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5440 and Xeon Platinum 9221. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5440 and Xeon Platinum 9221 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5440 and Xeon Platinum 9221 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5440 and Xeon Platinum 9221. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2933 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
Max memory channels | no data | 12 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 281.6 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5440 and Xeon Platinum 9221.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2008 | 2 April 2019 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Xeon E5440 has 212.5% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 9221, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5440 and Xeon Platinum 9221. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5440 and Xeon Platinum 9221, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.