Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Xeon E5440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5440
2008
80 Watt
1.50
Ryzen Embedded R1600
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
2.06
+37.3%

Ryzen Embedded R1600 outperforms Xeon E5440 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5440 and Ryzen Embedded R1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21541903
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency1.777.80
Architecture codenameno dataZen (2017−2020)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)25 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5440 and Ryzen Embedded R1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed2.83 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.8 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5440 and Ryzen Embedded R1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771FP5
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5440 and Ryzen Embedded R1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5440 and Ryzen Embedded R1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5440 and Ryzen Embedded R1600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5440 and Ryzen Embedded R1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2400

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5440 and Ryzen Embedded R1600.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5440 1.50
Ryzen Embedded R1600 2.06
+37.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5440 2389
Ryzen Embedded R1600 3276
+37.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.50 2.06
Recency 1 January 2008 25 February 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 25 Watt

Ryzen Embedded R1600 has a 37.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5440 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5440 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded R1600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5440 and Ryzen Embedded R1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5440
Xeon E5440
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600
Ryzen Embedded R1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 504 votes

Rate Xeon E5440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 33 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded R1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5440 or Ryzen Embedded R1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.