Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Xeon E5440

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5440
2008
80 Watt
1.55
+13.1%

Xeon E5440 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q6700 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21412249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.771.31
Architecture codenameno dataKentsfield (2007)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed2.83 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.67 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data2x 143 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data62 °C
Number of transistorsno data582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35V0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching+-
FSB parity+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q6700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q6700 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5440 1.55
+13.1%
Core 2 Quad Q6700 1.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5440 2374
+13.3%
Core 2 Quad Q6700 2095

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5440 368
+23.5%
Core 2 Quad Q6700 298

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5440 1040
+26.8%
Core 2 Quad Q6700 820

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 1.37
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon E5440 has a 13.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 31.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5440 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q6700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5440 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q6700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5440
Xeon E5440
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
Core 2 Quad Q6700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 479 votes

Rate Xeon E5440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 135 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5440 or Core 2 Quad Q6700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.