Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Xeon E5430
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5430 outperforms Core 2 Duo E8400 by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5430 and Core 2 Duo E8400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2107 | 2566 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.31 | 1.86 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | no data | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 1 October 2007 (16 years ago) | 1 January 2008 (16 years ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Core 2 Duo E8400 has 500% better value for money than Xeon E5430.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5430 and Core 2 Duo E8400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 104 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 410 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5430 and Core 2 Duo E8400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5430 and Core 2 Duo E8400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5430 and Core 2 Duo E8400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5430 and Core 2 Duo E8400.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon E5430 outperforms Core 2 Duo E8400 by 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon E5430 outperforms Core 2 Duo E8400 by 92% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core 2 Duo E8400 outperforms Xeon E5430 by 3% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon E5430 outperforms Core 2 Duo E8400 by 71% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.44 | 0.75 |
| Recency | 1 October 2007 | 1 January 2008 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon E5430 has a 92% higher aggregate performance score.
Core 2 Duo E8400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 23.1% lower power consumption.
The Xeon E5430 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E8400 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5430 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo E8400 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5430 and Core 2 Duo E8400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
