Celeron J3355 vs Xeon E5430

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5430
2007
80 Watt
1.41
+88%
Celeron J3355
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.75

Xeon E5430 outperforms Celeron J3355 by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5430 and Celeron J3355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22052645
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.677.10
Architecture codenameno dataApollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5430 and Celeron J3355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature67 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5430 and Celeron J3355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA771FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5430 and Celeron J3355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
FSB parity+no data
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5430 and Celeron J3355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5430 and Celeron J3355 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5430 and Celeron J3355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5430 and Celeron J3355 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5430 and Celeron J3355 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5430 and Celeron J3355.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5430 1.41
+88%
Celeron J3355 0.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5430 2238
+87%
Celeron J3355 1197

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5430 359
+32%
Celeron J3355 272

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5430 1055
+131%
Celeron J3355 456

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 0.75
Recency 1 October 2007 30 August 2016
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E5430 has a 88% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron J3355, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5430 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3355 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5430 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J3355 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5430 and Celeron J3355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5430
Xeon E5430
Intel Celeron J3355
Celeron J3355

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 168 votes

Rate Xeon E5430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 58 votes

Rate Celeron J3355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5430 or Celeron J3355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.