Athlon 5350 vs Xeon E5420
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5420 outperforms Athlon 5350 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5420 and Athlon 5350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2283 | 2388 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 1.50 | 4.24 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 1 October 2007 (17 years ago) | 9 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5420 and Athlon 5350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2.05 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 2048 KB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | 76 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 90 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5420 and Athlon 5350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA771 | AM1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5420 and Athlon 5350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | FMA4 |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5420 and Athlon 5350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5420 and Athlon 5350 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | - | no data |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5420 and Athlon 5350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-1600 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics |
| Number of pipelines | no data | 128 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5420 and Athlon 5350 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon E5420 and Athlon 5350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5420 and Athlon 5350.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.27 | 1.12 |
| Recency | 1 October 2007 | 9 April 2014 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 25 Watt |
Xeon E5420 has a 13.4% higher aggregate performance score.
Athlon 5350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.
The Xeon E5420 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 5350 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5420 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 5350 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5420 and Athlon 5350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
