Xeon Gold 5317 vs E5405

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5405
2007
80 Watt
1.12
Xeon Gold 5317
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 150 Watt
17.90
+1498%

Xeon Gold 5317 outperforms Xeon E5405 by a whopping 1498% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5405 and Xeon Gold 5317 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2401364
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.2810.88
Architecture codenameno dataIce Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5405 and Xeon Gold 5317 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threadsno data24
Base clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5405 and Xeon Gold 5317 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketLGA771FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5405 and Xeon Gold 5317. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5405 and Xeon Gold 5317 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5405 and Xeon Gold 5317 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5405 and Xeon Gold 5317. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5405 and Xeon Gold 5317.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5405 1.12
Xeon Gold 5317 17.90
+1498%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5405 1718
Xeon Gold 5317 27387
+1494%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5405 302
Xeon Gold 5317 1260
+317%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5405 1050
Xeon Gold 5317 9808
+834%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 17.90
Recency 1 October 2007 6 April 2021
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 150 Watt

Xeon E5405 has 87.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5317, on the other hand, has a 1498.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 5317 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5405 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5405 and Xeon Gold 5317, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5405
Xeon E5405
Intel Xeon Gold 5317
Xeon Gold 5317

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 31 vote

Rate Xeon E5405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 20 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5317 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5405 or Xeon Gold 5317, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.