Athlon Silver 3050e vs Xeon E5405

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5405
2007
80 Watt
1.12
Athlon Silver 3050e
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.92
+71.4%

Athlon Silver 3050e outperforms Xeon E5405 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5405 and Athlon Silver 3050e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24011983
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency1.2829.18
Architecture codenameno dataDali (Zen) (2020)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)1 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5405 and Athlon Silver 3050e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed2 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5405 and Athlon Silver 3050e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketLGA771FP5
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5405 and Athlon Silver 3050e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5405 and Athlon Silver 3050e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5405 and Athlon Silver 3050e are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5405 and Athlon Silver 3050e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5405 1.12
Athlon Silver 3050e 1.92
+71.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5405 1718
Athlon Silver 3050e 2939
+71.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5405 302
Athlon Silver 3050e 713
+136%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5405 1050
Athlon Silver 3050e 1364
+29.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 1.92
Recency 1 October 2007 1 June 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 6 Watt

Athlon Silver 3050e has a 71.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Silver 3050e is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5405 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5405 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon Silver 3050e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5405 and Athlon Silver 3050e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5405
Xeon E5405
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e
Athlon Silver 3050e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 31 vote

Rate Xeon E5405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 370 votes

Rate Athlon Silver 3050e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5405 or Athlon Silver 3050e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.