Apple M2 Pro vs Xeon E5-4669 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4669 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 135 Watt
7.25
Apple M2 Pro
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 2424 Watt
13.69
+88.8%

Apple M2 Pro outperforms Xeon E5-4669 v4 by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Apple M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking980537
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.30no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Apple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency5.08no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)no data
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,007no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Apple M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4412
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cacheno data3.3 MB
L2 cache5.5 MB36 MB
L3 cache55 MB24 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Million40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Apple M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt2424 ‑ 3504 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Apple M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Apple M2 Pro technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Apple M2 Pro are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Apple M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Apple M2 Pro.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 7.25
Apple M2 Pro 13.69
+88.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 11523
Apple M2 Pro 21741
+88.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.25 13.69
Recency 20 June 2016 17 January 2023
Physical cores 22 12
Threads 44 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 2424 Watt

Xeon E5-4669 v4 has 83.3% more physical cores and 266.7% more threads, and 1695.6% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Pro, on the other hand, has a 88.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M2 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4669 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4669 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4669 v4 and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4669 v4
Xeon E5-4669 v4
Apple M2 Pro
M2 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 11 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4669 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 174 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4669 v4 or Apple M2 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.