Ryzen 7 5700U vs Xeon E5-4650

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4650
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
5.29
Ryzen 7 5700U
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
9.97
+88.5%

Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms Xeon E5-4650 by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4650 and Ryzen 7 5700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1174770
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.37no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency3.8562.90
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Lucienne-U (Zen 2) (2021)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4650 and Ryzen 7 5700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data18
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size435 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4650 and Ryzen 7 5700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA2011FP6
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4650 and Ryzen 7 5700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4650 and Ryzen 7 5700U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4650 and Ryzen 7 5700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4650 and Ryzen 7 5700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size384 GB64 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4650 and Ryzen 7 5700U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4650 5.29
Ryzen 7 5700U 9.97
+88.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4650 8407
Ryzen 7 5700U 15838
+88.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.29 9.97
Recency 14 May 2012 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 5700U has a 88.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 5700U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4650 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 5700U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4650 and Ryzen 7 5700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4650
Xeon E5-4650
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
Ryzen 7 5700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3101 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 5700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4650 or Ryzen 7 5700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.