Ryzen 5 5500 vs Xeon E5-4640 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4640 v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
14.74
+16.3%

Xeon E5-4640 v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 5500 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking503622
Place by popularitynot in top-1001
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.0451.13
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency12.8017.77
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Cezanne (2021−2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)4 April 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,837$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 5500 has 1582% better value for money than Xeon E5-4640 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2412
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache30 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size306.18 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4700 Million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5500.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4640 v4 14.74
+16.3%
Ryzen 5 5500 12.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4640 v4 22559
+16.3%
Ryzen 5 5500 19397

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.74 12.67
Recency 20 June 2016 4 April 2022
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-4640 v4 has a 16.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 5 5500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 61.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-4640 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 5500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4640 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 5500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Ryzen 5 5500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4640 v4
Xeon E5-4640 v4
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
Ryzen 5 5500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 22 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4640 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 8216 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4640 v4 or Ryzen 5 5500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.