i9-11900F vs Xeon E5-4640 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4640 v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
14.20
+1.6%
Core i9-11900F
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
13.98

Xeon E5-4640 v4 outperforms Core i9-11900F by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Core i9-11900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking511530
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.00no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency12.8020.35
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,837no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Core i9-11900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier21no data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache30 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature80 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Core i9-11900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Core i9-11900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Core i9-11900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Core i9-11900F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Core i9-11900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1.5 TB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Core i9-11900F.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4640 v4 14.20
+1.6%
i9-11900F 13.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4640 v4 22559
+1.6%
i9-11900F 22210

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.20 13.98
Recency 20 June 2016 16 March 2021
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-4640 v4 has a 1.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

i9-11900F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 61.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Core i9-11900F.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4640 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-11900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4640 v4 and Core i9-11900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4640 v4
Xeon E5-4640 v4
Intel Core i9-11900F
Core i9-11900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 22 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4640 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 310 votes

Rate Core i9-11900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4640 v4 or Core i9-11900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.